Да он мог хотя бы не говорить уже в суде, что у него не было "expectation of privacy . . . in clothing that's been ripped off him as he's receiving medical attention." где только был его адвокат:)

Это, кажется, было существенно:

We begin by observing that the defendant expressly agreed below with the motion judge that he had "no expectation of privacy . . . in clothing that's been ripped off him as he's receiving medical attention." With the defendant having no expectation of privacy in the items the detective examined, there was no search in the constitutional sense. See Commonwealth v. Bly, 448 Mass. 473, 490 (2007), citing Commonwealth v. Montanez, 410 Mass. 290, 301 (1991) (defendant must have subjective expectation of privacy for "search" or "seizure" to occur). The defendant's arguments that the extent of the search exceeded the contours of the plain view doctrine are therefore unavailing.